API Integration Workflow Reviewer

Human Union Data, Inc.
United States
about 2 months ago
Apply on www.indeed.com
Prepare application

Role details

Contract type
Permanent contract
Employment type
Part-time (≤ 32 hours)
Working hours
Regular working hours
Job source

Tech stack

Testing (Software) Artificial Intelligence Code Review

Job description

API Integration Workflow Reviewer is a remote evaluation track for reviewing api integration workflow evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne’s quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.

Why this role matters

AI data reviewers help turn api integration workflow evaluation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for AuraOne Human Data., * Evaluate api integration workflow evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for API Integration Workflow Reviewer assignments.

  • Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
  • Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
  • Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.
  • Maintain reviewer-quality scores by calibrating against gold-standard examples each week.
  • Document recurring failure modes so the modeling team can target them in the next training run., * Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity.
  • Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.
  • Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.

Requirements

  • Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on api integration workflow evaluation or adjacent content for API Integration Workflow Reviewer work.
  • Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
  • Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
  • Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
  • Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week., * Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.
  • Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.
  • Domain expertise that lets you spot subject-matter errors automated checks miss., * Model output evaluation
  • Rubric-based annotation
  • Severity tagging
  • Inter-rater calibration
  • API Integration Workflow evaluation
  • Code review
  • Software testing
  • Agent evaluation
  • Integration

Work model

Remote - US-eligible. Remote · Independent specialist contractor. Employment type: CONTRACTOR. Applicants must be authorized to work from US.

Benefits & conditions

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.

Apply for this position

This job is hosted externally. Click below to view the full posting and apply.

Apply on www.indeed.com
Prepare application

Good distractions

Talks and stories from around this role — technically off-topic, practically not.

3:39 min

Addressing code review surrender and process exploitation

Laura Tacho Laura Tacho · World Congress 2026 Europe

2:49 min

Comparing software testing and software verification

Onur Kasimlar Onur Kasimlar · World Congress 2025

3:46 min

Core terminology and audiences for interpretable artificial intelligence

Karol Przystalski · LIVE

1:27 min

Software labs as environments for human and agent collaboration

Brian Lovin Brian Lovin · World Congress 2026 Europe

56 sec

The hidden costs of delayed peer code reviews

Tim Gilboy Tim Gilboy

1:16 min

Addressing human review scaling and tool integrations

Taylor Jordan Smith Taylor Jordan Smith · World Congress 2026 Europe

Videos

See all

Related articles

See all