Unit Test Generation Workflow Reviewer

Human Union Data, Inc.
United States
13 days ago

Role details

Contract type
Permanent contract
Employment type
Part-time (≤ 32 hours)
Working hours
Regular working hours
Job source

Tech stack

Testing (Software) Artificial Intelligence Unit Testing Code Review

Job description

Unit Test Generation Workflow Reviewer is a remote evaluation track for reviewing unit test generation workflow evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne’s quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.

Why this role matters

AI data reviewers help turn unit test generation workflow evaluation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for AuraOne Human Data., * Evaluate unit test generation workflow evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for Unit Test Generation Workflow Reviewer assignments.

  • Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
  • Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
  • Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.
  • Maintain reviewer-quality scores by calibrating against gold-standard examples each week.
  • Document recurring failure modes so the modeling team can target them in the next training run., * Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity.
  • Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.
  • Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.

Requirements

  • Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on unit test generation workflow evaluation or adjacent content for Unit Test Generation Workflow Reviewer work.
  • Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
  • Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
  • Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
  • Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week., * Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.
  • Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.
  • Domain expertise that lets you spot subject-matter errors automated checks miss., * Model output evaluation
  • Rubric-based annotation
  • Severity tagging
  • Inter-rater calibration
  • Unit Test Generation Workflow evaluation
  • Code review
  • Software testing
  • Agent evaluation
  • Unit
  • Test
  • Generation

Work model

Remote - US-eligible. Remote · Independent specialist contractor. Employment type: CONTRACTOR. Applicants must be authorized to work from US.

Benefits & conditions

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.

Apply for this position

This job is hosted externally. Click below to view the full posting and apply.

Apply on www.indeed.com

Good distractions

Talks and stories from around this role — technically off-topic, practically not.

1:57 min

Finding software engineers for rapid usability testing sessions

Anil Kumar Krishnashetty · WWC 2022

3:39 min

Addressing code review surrender and process exploitation

Laura Tacho Laura Tacho · WWC Europe 2026

2:55 min

Understanding the chore and effort of unit testing

Ewald Ewald · WWC 2024

2:49 min

Comparing software testing and software verification

Onur Kasimlar Onur Kasimlar · WWC 2025

2:31 min

Balancing automated checking with human-centric testing skills

Ingo Philipp · LIVE

56 sec

The hidden costs of delayed peer code reviews

Tim Gilboy Tim Gilboy

Videos

See all

Related articles

See all