Style Preference Preference Data Reviewer

Human Union Data, Inc.
United States
13 days ago

Role details

Contract type
Permanent contract
Employment type
Part-time (≤ 32 hours)
Working hours
Regular working hours
Job source

Tech stack

Artificial Intelligence Data Auditing

Job description

Style Preference Preference Data Reviewer is a remote evaluation track for reviewing style preference preference data evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne’s quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.

Why this role matters

AI data reviewers help turn style preference preference data evaluation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for AuraOne Human Data., * Evaluate style preference preference data evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for Style Preference Preference Data Reviewer assignments.

  • Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
  • Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
  • Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.
  • Maintain reviewer-quality scores by calibrating against gold-standard examples each week.
  • Document recurring failure modes so the modeling team can target them in the next training run., * Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity.
  • Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.
  • Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.

Requirements

  • Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on style preference preference data evaluation or adjacent content for Style Preference Preference Data Reviewer work.
  • Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
  • Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
  • Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
  • Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week., * Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.
  • Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.
  • Domain expertise that lets you spot subject-matter errors automated checks miss., * Model output evaluation
  • Rubric-based annotation
  • Severity tagging
  • Inter-rater calibration
  • Style Preference Preference Data evaluation
  • Preference ranking
  • RLHF
  • Rater calibration
  • Style
  • Preference

Work model

Remote - US-eligible. Remote · Independent specialist contractor. Employment type: CONTRACTOR. Applicants must be authorized to work from US.

Benefits & conditions

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.

Apply for this position

This job is hosted externally. Click below to view the full posting and apply.

Apply on www.indeed.com

Good distractions

Talks and stories from around this role — technically off-topic, practically not.

3:46 min

Core terminology and audiences for interpretable artificial intelligence

Karol Przystalski · LIVE

3:16 min

Advantages of reproducible configurations and instantaneous rollbacks

Álvaro Martín Lozano · LIVE

2:38 min

Rapid fire preferences on hiring practices and workplace models

Rudi Bauer Rudi Bauer +1 · Cappuccino with HR

3:21 min

Automating complete quality assurance pipelines with artificial intelligence

Evelyn Haslinger · LIVE

3:08 min

Conducting data audits and adversarial testing on models

Toju Duke · WWC 2022

3:24 min

Evaluating remote software roles and compensation structures

Nacho Iacovino · WWC 2021

Videos

See all

Related articles

See all