Computer-Use Agent Evaluator

Human Union Data, Inc.
United States
14 days ago

Role details

Contract type
Permanent contract
Employment type
Part-time (≤ 32 hours)
Working hours
Regular working hours
Job source

Tech stack

Artificial Intelligence Computer Literacy Software Engineering

Job description

Computer-Use Agent Evaluator is a remote evaluation track for reviewing computer use agent evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne’s quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.

Why this role matters

AI data reviewers help turn computer use agent evaluation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for AuraOne Human Data., * Evaluate computer use agent evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for Computer-Use Agent Evaluator assignments.

  • Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
  • Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
  • Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.
  • Maintain reviewer-quality scores by calibrating against gold-standard examples each week.
  • Document recurring failure modes so the modeling team can target them in the next training run., * Compare two computer use agent evaluation model responses to the same prompt and pick the stronger one with rationale.
  • Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity.
  • Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.
  • Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.

Requirements

  • Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on computer use agent evaluation or adjacent content for Computer-Use Agent Evaluator work.
  • Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
  • Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
  • Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
  • Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week., * Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.
  • Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.
  • Domain expertise that lets you spot subject-matter errors automated checks miss., * Model output evaluation
  • Rubric-based annotation
  • Severity tagging
  • Inter-rater calibration
  • Computer Use Agent evaluation
  • Software engineering and computer use
  • AI evaluation
  • Rubric writing
  • Expert review

Work model

Remote - US-eligible. Remote · Independent specialist contractor. Employment type: CONTRACTOR. Applicants must be authorized to work from US.

Benefits & conditions

Hourly rate confirmed after the interview process.

Apply for this position

This job is hosted externally. Click below to view the full posting and apply.

Apply on www.indeed.com

Good distractions

Talks and stories from around this role — technically off-topic, practically not.

3:46 min

Core terminology and audiences for interpretable artificial intelligence

Karol Przystalski · LIVE

1:22 min

Understanding software engineering as more than just coding

Lilia Gargouri Lilia Gargouri · WWC Europe 2026

3:42 min

Addressing educational gaps and retaining early female technological talent

Rudi Bauer Rudi Bauer +1 · Cappuccino with HR

1:38 min

Gathering human signals to validate agent helpfulness

Kesha Mykhailov Kesha Mykhailov · WWC Europe 2026

3:21 min

Automating complete quality assurance pipelines with artificial intelligence

Evelyn Haslinger · LIVE

1:29 min

Undervaluing product design by treating software engineers as generic programmers

Marlene Roth Marlene Roth +1 · WWC 2025

Videos

See all

Related articles

See all